Everyday PR

PR Fundamentals Elected Obama

While the tools of public relations have evolved over time, the basics of research, planning, implementation and evaluation remain the most effective approach to accomplishing specified goals.  And what if your goal is to be elected President of the United States?  Then you turn to the best, brightest and most successful strategists and public relations thinkers like Barack Obama did for his 2008 presidential campaign. 

Smart Choice was one of several Clinton campaign slogans.

Based on the best-seller book Game Change by political reporters John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, here’s what I believe to be the backbone of success for the Obama campaign:

1)  Research – Know your audience.  Some politicians did (like Clinton’s large female voter base), and some didn’t (John Edwards never did get how his supporters didn’t like any philandering behavior).  From focus groups to ad testing, Obama’s camp got it right.  They tested messages in various formats and presentations before any public unveiling.  Conversely, McCain’s campaign conducted little to no research (which happened to match the amount of budget they had for such a fundamental).  Ads often hit airwaves without the candidate having seen them.  

2)  Planning- It was literally hours before McCain settled on Sarah Palin as the VP selection.  The lack of proper vetting and preparation made what as supposed to be a ”game change” announcement a short-lived bright spot. In addition, the GOP strategy lacked an overall anticipation of issues, key talking points, message consistency and ability to stay on point.  Clinton’s staff, on the other hand, appeared to overly plan, as in changing the campaign’s slogan several times in as many months. 

3)  Implementation – After initial campaign overload by Obama strategists, they adjusted their approach and schedule, which showed the ability, and more importantly the adaptability, to be fluid during this phase.  Both the Clinton and McCain camps seemed to be shooting it from the hip especially as they got closer to the  election. 

4)  Evaluation - My respect for Clinton shot way up after reading the book.  She was the only one quoted as actually having a decent reason to want to be president, and she was fiercely protective of her daughter, which tells me about her character.  However, at the end of the day, Hillary’s biggest liability was Bill, hence the painful delay in conceding to Obama.  McCain, on the other hand, fought the good fight even though he likely knew the outcome of the battle.  I respect the fact that he’s not a quitter.

If you’ve read Game Change, what other fundamentals did you find?  If you haven’t read it, you should.  Ample political poop for all sides  of the aisle.

Category: Issues Management

Tagged: , , , ,

6 Responses

  1. Gary Lawrence says:

    Obama had a well tuned highly skilled machine behind him, there is no doubt about that. As a result the American people elected a community organizer not qualified to be the President of the United States. You always get what you pay for. Deception can’t change the outcome.

    • everydaypr says:

      In addition to a talented campaign machine, Obama also enjoyed unprecedented fundraising efforts, yet another public relations component in certain venues.

  2. Don Barkman says:

    The book is a very good read. Actually, it is scary. The only person who comes out looking near normal is Obama. Hillary apparently has her own demons. The rest are just a bit bizarre, Palin in particular. What the book points out is that we have an exceptionally poor process of creating presidential candidates. We get political wack jobs or unprepared aspirants. The system can handle that in the legislative branch where there are many members, but we have only one president at a time. If the govt was a corporation, its executive succession plan would get an "F."

    • everydaypr says:

      Scary IS a good way to describe this book; actually, I was more concerned than anything with the big picture process, as you pointed out. And you're right, if the government were a publicly held corporation, earnings would be repeatedly missed, if not totally abandoned, for the sake of fulfilling a term. I truly am concerned for this country and the flawed process by which we elect our leaders. Thanks for commenting.

  3. Bill H. says:

    After reading your PR piece today I am reminded of the basic selling points. They are almost like what you wrote in a different way. They are still used today as well as 100 years ago and more. ATTENTION, THE PRODUCT, SELL THE BENEFITS, CLOSE THE SALE. It will work in any situation.

  4. everydaypr says:

    Excellent insight re: selling points. Thanks for commenting.

Leave a Reply

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree